Daniel S. Greenberg, Science Journalist and Iconoclast, Dies at 88

[ad_1]

Several discovered this kind of parody witty. For some in Washington, it was a little bit also biting.

Mr. Greenberg bought SGR in 1997 to the publishers John Wiley & Sons, who revealed it for about 5 years, Ms. Reif stated, right before marketing it to F&S Publications. It folded a number of decades later.

As an writer Mr. Greenberg wrote about the intersection of science, politics and dollars in two other publications, “Science, Money and Politics: Political Triumph and Ethical Erosion” (2001) and “Science for Sale: The Perils, Rewards, and Delusions of Campus Capitalism” (2007). He wrote often for The Moments, The New England Journal of Medication and The London Assessment of Publications, among other publications.

Daniel Sheldon Greenberg was born in Brooklyn on May 5, 1931, the more youthful son of Max and Bertha (Rosenberg) Greenberg. His father was an accountant, his mother a homemaker. Three many years afterwards, the family members moved to the Bronx, wherever Mr. Greenberg grew up.

His brother, Jack Greenberg, was the mentioned legal scholar and civil rights activist who succeeded Thurgood Marshall as head of the NAACP Lawful Defense Fund. He died in 2016.

Daniel Greenberg graduated from Columbia College in 1953 and entered the Navy. On leaving the support in 1955, he joined the newspaper The Journal-Just about every Night in Wilmington, Del. (it ceased publication in 1960), prior to shifting to The Washington Put up, in which he worked from 1957 to 1961, when he took up a fellowship in Congress. He later on worked for Science right until 1970.

His initial relationship, to Polly Hoben, finished in divorce. In addition to Ms. Reif, a lawyer whom he married in 1979, he is survived by four young children from his very first marriage — Julie, Margaret (who is recognized as Miggie), Cathryn and Liza Greenberg — and a stepdaughter, Gwendolyn Bradley.

Dr. Sarewitz recalled Mr. Greenberg as “cranky, cantankerous, overwhelming a bit,” and added, “I did not adore becoming interviewed by him.” But he explained there have been still much far too many journalists who are “cheerleaders” for science.

[ad_2]

Supply hyperlink